Format: ORAL

Quentin Groom1, Sofie Meeus1

1 Meise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium

In response to historical inequalities, museums are engaging in the decolonization of biodiversity collections. This entails acknowledging collection histories, enhancing accessibility, and promoting collaborative research. Despite this effort, decolonization remains contentious due to unequal access, biopiracy concerns, and parachute science where Global North researchers extract specimens from the Global South without considering local concerns. Internationally the Nagoya Protocol aims to ensure fair benefit sharing, yet scepticism persists. We used a data-driven approach to understand the interplay between research, biological collection, and international collaboration. Focusing on Montserrat and the Cayman Islands, the study analyses collector profiles, their publications, and affiliations using data mediated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and Wikidata. By using a data driven approach we try to quantify some of the less tangible benefits of biological collection and provide objective information on this issue. Our results reveal specimens from these islands are held predominantly in the USA, Canada, and the UK. Most of the research conducted is related to taxonomy. However, digitization gaps may skew findings. The study emphasises the need for equitable sharing of both monetary and non-monetary benefits. While researchers gain knowledge and prestige, territories should benefit from research outcomes. Open-access publishing, data sharing, and duplicate contributions to local collections are suggested to enhance collaboration. This aims to improve relationships, rectify historical disparities, and inform equitable practices. In conclusion, biodiversity collection decolonization involves recognizing historical imbalances and promoting inclusive collaboration. The study advocates for responsible research practices, acknowledging local expertise, and fostering equitable partnerships. By delving into collection complexities, the study envisions a more equitable future for biodiversity research and conservation.